Greg > Davids comment about not being able to fit my observation refers. Ive had a > look at the pass in question and see that 79050A passed over at the same > time. I have to dig out a set of elements for 79050A around that date ( I > do have but other pc is tied up at the moment), but using more recent > elements for it, 79050A and 94-017B were together at the time of my claimed > observation so I am almost 100% certain that the observation of 94-017B is > in fact an observation of 79050A - this is what happens when there are too > many satellites. Unfortunately I no longer have the video tape (I thought I > did but the one still "alive" was for later in the night). > > Sorry about misleading everyone! > Cheers > Greg Now that we've got 94-17B organised, I've looked back at my May orbit. If you hadn't posted your June observation, Russell would have been looking for a satellite 50 minutes late instead of 36! All's well that ends well... David. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 08 2003 - 02:46:44 EDT