Kevin posted: >I still didn't spot 90023 last night My last observations 2 weeks ago had a 40 second time residual, so I did not use those obs. Then I forgot to try to check up on this object. If it is being noved, then the mean motion should be changed from 1.0027 to 1.0028 or 1.0029 or ?? 1 90023U 04776A 06254.67629765 0.00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 06 2 90023 5.1508 166.1428 0015125 241.2773 118.7329 1.00290000 06 So it could now be 1 or 2 degrees east of a predicted position that used a synchronous mean motion of 1.0027. Mike McCants ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 03 2006 - 10:24:49 EDT