Re: Question about a satellite I may have imaged

From: matt--- via Seesat-l <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 14:38:13 -0400
I agree regarding the size.  And the fact that it was so visible in
h-alpha struck me as odd. But I cant think of anything else, so I
thought I'd ask. 

Best regards, 

Matt 

On 2020-07-02 14:28, Gonzalo Blasco wrote:

> Im not a experienced expert but my 2 cents 
> 
> I think is big for a Satellite, but perhaps is a visual effect and someone has more info. The ISS transits photos I ve seen are smaller than the photos you atached , and probably ISS is the biggest satellites in terms of apparent size. 
> 
> It seems in fact some out of focus near-object like a BUG... What do you think? 
> 
> Sincerely,
> 
> --
> Gonzalo Blasco Gil 
> 
> El jue., 2 de jul. de 2020 a la(s) 12:49, matt--- via Seesat-l (seesat-l_at_satobs.org) escribió: 
> 
>> Hello again,
>> Looks like my attachments may not have made it through.  They can be 
>> found here as well
>> 
>> http://www.considine.net/SatCrossing_017_20200702_143833.011_UT.jpg
>> http://www.considine.net/SatCrossing_018_20200702_143833.139_UT.jpg
>> http://www.considine.net/SatCrossing_019_20200702_143833.268_UT.jpg
>> http://www.considine.net/SatCrossing_020_20200702_143833.397_UT.jpg
>> http://www.considine.net/SatCrossing_021_20200702_143833.526_UT.jpg
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Matt
>> 
>> On 2020-07-02 13:37, matt--- via Seesat-l wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> 
>>> I am trying to identify a satellite(?) that I happened to catch cross 
>>> my
>>> field of view this morning while viewing the sun.  I've tried websites
>>> such as heavens-above, calsky, etc to try to figure out after the fact
>>> what I might have seen, but have been unsuccessful.
>>> 
>>> So I have two questions, really:
>>> 
>>> 1) what would be the "go to" sites with search engines to use to try to
>>> figure this out, if any; and
>>> 
>>> 2) with the details provided below (hopefully in compliance with the
>>> posting rules), can anyone help identify what I saw?  I did some rough
>>> calcs on my own of size assuming a distance, but would prefer to hear
>>> what those more knowledgeable would say.
>>> 
>>> For what it is worth, since I was only getting setup at the time, my
>>> camera orientation wasn't well done.  I was trying to expose for the
>>> prominence and I think I had my frames flipped around.  The sun at that
>>> time, as seen by the GONG sites in H-alpha, can be seen here
>>> 
>>> http://halpha.nso.edu/keep/hag/202007/20200702/20200702143834Ah.jpg
>>> 
>>> I think in my images "south" near the mid-point of the left side of the
>>> images attached, but I am not confident in saying which direction the
>>> travel was.  The "bump" of a prominence shown is near the bottom of the
>>> images on the GONG site.
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> 
>>> Matt Considine
>>> 
>>> Randolph, VT USA
>>> 
>>> 1. ID of object: UNKNOWN
>>> 
>>> 2. Description and dimensions of object (metres), if known. APPEARS TWO
>>> BE TWO CONNECTED PANELS
>>> 
>>> 3. Observing site location: latitude, longitude, altitude, to nearest
>>> 100 m. LAT 43.9508125 LONG -72.6671875 ALT 283m
>>> 
>>> 4. Date/time of obs: UTC. For single frames, report time to nearest
>>> second. For video, report start time and duration to nearest second. 
>>> UTC
>>> 20200702 14:38:33.011-14:38:33.526
>>> 
>>> 5. Range to object: UNKNOWN
>>> 
>>> 6. Telescope: make/model/aperture LUNT 60mm aperture 500mm focal length
>>> ***H-alpha***
>>> 
>>> 7. Camera: make/model ZWO ASI174MM
>>> 
>>> 8. Tracking method: hand-guided, or mechanical (make/model): ROUGHLY
>>> TRACKING SUN
>>> 
>>> 9. Data acquired: total duration, frame rate, exposure per frame,
>>> resolution & bit depth of raw data
>>> 
>>> DURATION: 0.515 secs FRAME RATE approx 8fps EXPOSURE 0.64401secs 16BIT
>>> no binning BRIGHTNESS=0 GAIN=0 SOFTWARE  SharpCap 3.2.6248.0
>>> 
>>> 10. Processing: describe the process of frame-selection and/or
>>> image-processing used to obtain reported results.
>>> 
>>> Frames captured using above settings in SharpCap.  No Post processing.
>>> Acquired in SER file format, with attached frames saved as JPEG.  No
>>> barlow used.
>>> 
>>> 11. Raw image frames:
>>> 
>>> No processing has been done to attached images
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Seesat-l mailing list
>>> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Seesat-l mailing list
>> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
_______________________________________________
Seesat-l mailing list
http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
Received on Thu Jul 02 2020 - 13:38:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jul 02 2020 - 18:38:58 UTC