I must respectfully disagree about the ORS-1 candidate I saw last month being the r/b. I had a chance to see both the r/b and the payload found yesterday by Derek, and 37728 is definitely what I saw as reported in: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Jul-2011/0011.html The r/b is variable, which I would have noticed easily, and has the dull appearance of most r/b. The payload was steady, 6th mag (as seen before) and had the silvery appearance of many other payloads I've seen. Perhaps the positions I gave last month were far enough off to explain the discrepancy? Tonight, I hope to go back out, until then: 37728 11 029A 8336 G 20110819023950470 17 25 1656242+835269 19 S 37728 11 029A 8336 G 20110819023958830 17 25 2025433+831363 18 S 37728 11 029A 8336 G 20110819024021150 17 25 2315212+705264 28 S 37728 11 029A 8336 G 20110819024046430 17 25 2349235+572811 38 S 11- 29 B 11-08-19 02:02:07 BY 87.7 0.5 6 14.6 A; 6->8 COSPAR 8336 = TULSA1 36.139208,-95.983429 COSPAR 8335 = TULSA2 +35.8311 -96.1411 1100ft -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/private/seesat-l/attachments/20110818/df0bf456/attachment.html _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 19 2011 - 04:06:45 UTC