Tiangong 1 Out of Control?

  Hi:

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/sep/21/chinas-tiangong-1-space-station-out-of-control-crash-to-earth
Maybe will reenter late in 2017.

-- 
Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke
http://www.PRC68.com
http://www.end2partygovernment.com/2012Issues.html
The lesser of evils is still evil.

-------- Original Message --------
> Send Seesat-l mailing list submissions to
> 	seesat-l_at_satobs.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	seesat-l-request_at_satobs.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	seesat-l-owner_at_satobs.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Seesat-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>     1. Sept 22 obs (Kevin Fetter)
>     2. correct obs for unid (Kevin Fetter)
>     3. RE: Alternative Ofeq 11 elements (ronlee_at_pcisys.net)
>     4. BY O 092316 (Brad Young)
>     5. Possible OTV 4? (Jos? Luis Ruiz)
>     6. Optical 21 Sept 2016 (Greg Roberts)
>     7. Possible OTV 4? (Jos? Luis Ruiz)
>     8. 2016SEP22-23.OBS (Russell Eberst)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:25:31 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Kevin Fetter <kfetter_at_yahoo.com>
> To: <SeeSat-L_at_satobs.org>
> Subject: Sept 22 obs
> Message-ID: <1860601032.2940691.1474565131310_at_mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 23435 94 084A   1775 G 20160922084909000 18 25 0547512+063434 37 S
> 23435 94 084A   1775 G 20160922085636000 18 25 0555125+064989 37 S
> 26716 01 009B   1775 G 20160922063130000 18 25 0256775-053951 37 S
> 26716 01 009B   1775 G 20160922063855000 18 25 0304129-051858 37 S
> 39168 13 024A   1775 G 20160922050435000 18 25 0150449-064657 37 S
> 39168 13 024A   1775 G 20160922051139000 18 25 0157539-064649 37 S
> 99999 99 999A   1775 G 20160922051139000 18 25 0553511+064085 37 S
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:48:23 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Kevin Fetter <kfetter_at_yahoo.com>
> To: <SeeSat-L_at_satobs.org>
> Subject: correct obs for unid
> Message-ID: <453001344.3000351.1474570103811_at_mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> What the obs should really be. Bjorn alerted me, to my goof, thanks Bjorn.
>
> 99999 99 999A   1775 G 20160922085621000 18 25 0553511+064085 37
>
> Kevin
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:02:42 -0600 (MDT)
> From: ronlee_at_pcisys.net
> To: seesat-l_at_satobs.org
> Subject: RE: Alternative Ofeq 11 elements
> Message-ID:
> 	<0fca40cc5337abaf1642b0bc7cdbecaf.squirrel_at_mail.pcisys.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Thanks Greg.   I have been looking to the SSW or SW using binoculars
> since it was near Antares.  I will have to try in a more easterly direction.
>
>
>
>> Ron -   Ofeq satellites are generally bright - about mag +3 when rising
>> in the east because the phase angle is near optimum since the sun has
>> recently set but it fades rapidly as it heads westward and by the time
>> its near the meridian it has faded several magnitudes. Past the meridian
>> they are very faint - mag 8 or even fainter so the secret is to get them
>> low down as they come out of the earths shadow and heading westward.
>> Cheers
>> Greg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Seesat-l mailing list
>> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 03:03:28 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Brad Young <allenb_young_at_yahoo.com>
> To: Seesat List <seesat-l_at_satobs.org>
> Subject: BY O 092316
> Message-ID: <693024837.1525996.1474599808504_at_mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> 25724 99 023A   8336 G 20160923011533740 17 25 2154769+094752 48 R
> 25724 99 023A   8336 G 20160923011620840 17 25 2208451+093235 18 R
> 25724 99 023A   8336 G 20160923011640930 17 25 2214049+092421 67 R
> 10594 77 112F   8336 G 20160923015824530 17 25 1735350-165924 78
> 10594 77 112F   8336 G 20160923015836210 17 25 1749387-200540 38
> 10594 77 112F   8336 G 20160923015845470 17 25 1800178-223041 28
> FPAS12,41766,R8336A,20160923,010147,1s,-,36.1,-95.9,220,FUUG,TEs,k,5s,-2,2,G1CkNNT,N,-,-,-,035.5 0.5 003 17.8 A,-,-,-;
> FPAS12,03338,R8336B,20160923,012146,1s,-,36.1,-95.9,220,SUBG,FNe,k,22s,9,k,G1CkNNN,N,-,-,-,-,-,-,-;
> FPAS12,04298,R8336C,20160923,020320,1s,-,36.1,-95.9,220,SUBG,SEs,k,65s,9,k,G1SkNNN,N,-,-,-,-,-,-,eov;
>   Brad Young Bright:20 x 80 Celestron binoculars parallelogram tripod Dim:22" f/4.2 UC Obsession _at_ 100x Numbers above and methods explained at: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Jan-2015/0074.html COSPAR 8336 =TULSA1 +36.139208,-95.983429 660ft, 201m COSPAR 8335 =TULSA2 +35.8311  -96.1411 1083ft, 330m
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 08:14:30 +0200
> From: Jos? Luis Ruiz <jose.ruiz.gomez_at_gmail.com>
> To: Seesat-l_at_satobs.org
> Subject: Possible OTV 4?
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAFHWoeg0SQT_Cz0qb4zw0dTJ3c-B_9QUVUp+5tVV9iW_7U7aAw_at_mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> I have taken two partial photographs, but with only one point, I will try
> to analyze. For now, nothing appears in that orbit. If OTV 4 seems to have
> maneuvered to a higher orbit it has since spent more than half an hour late
> of schedule and a few degrees further south. I was tired of waiting, and I
> was, when I see appear halfway up to the west. Luckily there was only me
> away steps 2-3, all used to open the camera focal length 100 mm instead of
> 73 mm I control better for fast moving objects, so there is only one point
> available, however, the trail left can help as to the places where it was.
> 3602.

_______________________________________________
Seesat-l mailing list
http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l