You're right, the motion would be retrograde, not prograde. Inclination 111 seems high (not common), it wouldn't surprise me if the positional error was large enough to allow for something in a sun-sync orbit. On Sun, 27 Sep 2015, Ted Molczan via Seesat-l wrote: > Sean Sullivan wrote: > >> Not with anything resembling accuracy. I was unfortunately distracted by >> having a camera in my hand (set for the eclipse) and trying to reconfigure >> it in the dark. I got a few photos and one video, but looking back at >> them, not good quality. But I'll take a shot: from 0h45 +48 to 19h45m >> -4. > > That yields roughly 111 deg inclination and 111 deg RAAN. > > Ted Molczan > > > _______________________________________________ > Seesat-l mailing list > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l > _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-lReceived on Sun Sep 27 2015 - 22:27:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Sep 28 2015 - 03:27:23 UTC