Yes, I think you're right. Spaceweather posted the MN observation during the (likely final) Canada pass, but they've now updated the post including the observation time which points to the earlier pass. Sorry for the mixup. On Sep 24, 2011, at 1:18 AM, Frank@reednavigation.com wrote: > Yes, but I believe that this Minnesota observation was one orbit earlier --about an hour and a quarter before the "not seen" comments from Roger in Oregon and Dale Ireland near Seattle that you were replying to. So we have no reports of it having been seen in over two hours, right? Nothing after 2200 CDT/0300 UT? > > Frank Reed > > > _______________________________________________ > Seesat-l mailing list > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 24 2011 - 05:25:15 UTC