Ted has discovered that I was using an incorrect lat/long for the observatory in Bulgaria that observed this object. I have used elcor to determine the following search orbits. 1 90011U 02624A 10252.89820192 .00000000 00000-0 00000+0 0 06 2 90011 27.0746 208.6750 7238981 356.4939 351.6162 2.00200000 02 1 90011U 02624A 10252.89820192 .00000000 00000-0 00000+0 0 06 2 90011 27.0746 208.6841 7243984 356.4395 352.9008 2.00600000 05 1 90011U 02624A 10252.89820192 .00000000 00000-0 00000+0 0 06 2 90011 27.0746 208.6933 7248979 356.3853 354.1851 2.01000000 09 1 90011U 02624A 10252.89820192 .00000000 00000-0 00000+0 0 06 2 90011 27.0747 208.7025 7253963 356.3313 355.4692 2.01400000 04 1 90011U 02624A 10253.09149733 .00000000 00000-0 00000+0 0 04 2 90011 27.0747 208.6850 7273807 356.2073 141.8637 2.03000000 04 Obviously the mean motion is quite uncertain. An SGP4 fit to the original obs gives 1 90011U 02624A 10253.09149733 .00000000 00000-0 00000+0 0 04 2 90011 27.0754 208.7857 7331300 355.6108 160.1089 2.07680658 07 I consider this unlikely, but not impossible. Mike McCants _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 12 2010 - 17:09:55 UTC