Re: Telstar 4 a total loss

From: Kevin Fetter (kfetter@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:25:51 EDT

Next message: Greg Roberts: "Obs 23 Sept 2003"

Previous message: Björn Gimle: "Re: Telstar 4 a total loss"
In reply to: Björn Gimle: "Re: Telstar 4 a total loss"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

It's telstar 402 R parked at 89 W that failed.

TELSTAR 402R
1 23670U 95049A   03266.18030894 -.00000189  00000-0  10000-3 0  1013
2 23670   0.0523 345.0138 0001895 191.4122 161.1078  1.00271095 29287

They were going to launch telstar 8, and park it there. 

But since they couldn't boost this one to the graveyard, should be interesting to see what
happens, once it starts to drift.

Kevin

--- Björn_Gimle <b_gimle@algonet.se> wrote:
> What/where is Telstar 4 ?
> Alldat.tle has Telstar 401/402/402R (22927 23249 23670/93077A 94058A
> 95049A)
> 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org
List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Greg Roberts: "Obs 23 Sept 2003"
Previous message: Björn Gimle: "Re: Telstar 4 a total loss"
In reply to: Björn Gimle: "Re: Telstar 4 a total loss"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 25 2003 - 08:30:27 EDT