I disagree that Walter's tagline comment & repl(ies) was/were "unacceptable to abuse this group" & "superfluous" comments. occasional worldwide comments emerging from the milieu in which we observe are often interesting and non_superflous. non_obs report, I saw no satellites last night. At 09:13 9/30/2002 +0100, you wrote: >Seesaters subscribe to this newsgroup because they like going out >at night to watch satellites and share their experience with others. >Therefore, it is unacceptable to abuse this group to spread personal >opinions about anything else. >So, please, spare us with such superfluous and inappropriate comments. > >It's a matter of courtesy. > >Rainer > > > > >>Unprecendented disaster? (*) Think again. Try this on for size. In >>1928 the German government required registration of all firearms. In >>1938 the government confiscated all privately held arms. In the >>following 7 years the government itself killed 6,000,000 civilians. >>These atrocities were ended only by the intervention of the US, which >>cost the lives of 407,000 of America's finest young men. Try writing >>3,000 enough times to total up to 407,000. >>(*) How could it be that hype is necessary to sell a 9/11 story? > > >----------------------------------------------------------------- >Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' >in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org >http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 30 2002 - 09:52:35 EDT