J002E3 Question

From: jcm@head-cfa.harvard.edu
Date: Tue Sep 24 2002 - 00:03:02 EDT

  • Next message: Robert Oler: "RE: More on 2000 SG344 vs. J002E3"

    Sue Worden wrote:
    > technically feasible for HST to be pointed at
    the object 
    The problem is that a 6-m diameter object at 400000 km subtends
    an angle of 3 milliarcseconds, which is 30 times smaller than
    Hubble can resolve. 
     - Jonathan
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Sep 24 2002 - 00:11:29 EDT