On Mon, 1 Sep 1997, Jim Varney wrote: > I did not see FORTE again tonight. I'm glad you understand, Jay; me, > I'm a little befuddled -- look at the large disparity between the two > passes predicted by OIG's elset and the elset from Orbital Sciences: > > 24920 97047A FORTE(OIG) Elset Age: 1.3 days > 19970902 04:43:06 -127.4754 41.0412 831 1044 -24.0 300.77 50.01 > 24920 97047A FORTE(OSC) Elset Age: 3.5 days > 19970902 04:22:26 -124.8571 39.7304 806 879 -20.6 296.36 64.93 > ^^^^^^^^ > FORTE(OIG) > 1 24920U 97047A 97243.85199513 .00001403 00000-0 65110-3 0 85 > 2 24920 69.9582 269.2740 0023318 166.7783 193.3923 14.22578615 318 > FORTE(OSC) > 1 24920U 99001A 97241.63283565 .00000000 00000-0 00000-0 0 15 > 2 24920 70.0020 272.5930 0001034 195.6230 331.1350 14.27534500 12 ^ > Putting reasonable drag numbers in the OSC elset doesn't help much. Look at the big difference in period. That should account for several minutes over a couple of days, shouldn't it? Jay Respler -- Details of how to get on the Satellite Observer Mail List, elements, prediction programs and other satellite information, at the Visual Satellite Observers Home Page: http://www2.plasma.mpe-garching.mpg.de/sat/satintro.html -- JRespler@InJersey.com Satellite Tracker * Early Typewriter Collector Freehold, New Jersey