Re: Re: A flaring (mag -1.5) retrograde satellite to identify

From: alain.figer@club-internet.fr
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 10:07:12 UTC

  • Next message: Greg Roberts: "Optical 22 Oct 2008"

    
    
    
    
    
    Flashmail
    
    
    
    

    Thanks, Björn, for the identification.

     

    Sorry, I did a mistake about my timings. My watch was late by 13 seconds, but I applied the time correction as it was early instead !

     

    So, I observed 03-09 C near Polaris at about 18h 41:13 and it flared at 18h41:28 UT.

     

    Regards

     

    Alain Figer

     


    ----Message d'origine----
    >De: "Bjoern Gimle@GlocalNet"
    >A: SeeSat-L@satobs.org
    >Copie ā: "Chris Peat"
    >Sujet: Re: A flaring (mag -1.5) retrograde satellite to identify
    >Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:14:00 +0200
    > format=flowed;
    > charset="iso-8859-1";
    > reply-type=original
    > autolearn=disabled, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 3.36)
    >
    >Flashmail
    >IGS-1 rocket #27700 03-09C passed 3 degrees from Polaris (same side as the
    >SL-3 rocket) around 18:41:12
    >
    >----- Original Message -----
    >
    > Hi all,
    >
    >Yesterday evening my attention was attracted at 18h 40.8 mn UT by a bright
    >satellite near Polaris, challenging its brightness, and descending due
    >North - slightly western to the north, the signature of a retrograde
    >satellite. Its crossing in the sky was about the same as that of Cosmos 405
    >rocket I just observed a few minutes before (near 18h34 UT).
    >However the sense of the pass (SN) was just reversed, as Cosmos 405 rocket
    >(passing NS) is a 81.2° inclined satellite.
    >Hence the estimated inclination of the retro satellite is to be roughly i
    >97°-98°.
    >And it might have culminated not far from ENE at altitude 72°-80°.
    >
    >Its brightness was increasing and it flared briefly at about mag -1.5 at 18h
    >41m 02s.
    >
    >Thanks for identifying this satellite, not listed in the H-A predictions for
    >my site (listing for mag better than 5.0), since its magnitude must have
    >been indicated as a mere "?" by Chris Peat...


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Oct 23 2008 - 10:08:14 UTC