Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged

From: Björn Gimle (b_gimle@algonet.se)
Date: Sun Oct 10 2004 - 04:37:39 EDT

Next message: Leo Barhorst: "LB obs 2004-10-10"

Previous message: Steve Newcomb: "Re: OIG gone"
In reply to: b_gimle@algonet.se: "Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I have replaced DE0303G2a.gif, correcting a mistake, and slightly sharpened
it.
DE0303G2s.gif is more sharpened, but also more grainy.

> >----Original message----
> >www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/gif/DE0303G2a.gif
> >www.algonet.se/~b_gimle/gif/DE0303G1b.gif
> >

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Leo Barhorst: "LB obs 2004-10-10"
Previous message: Steve Newcomb: "Re: OIG gone"
In reply to: b_gimle@algonet.se: "Re: Re: How Columbia was imaged"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Oct 10 2004 - 04:47:49 EDT