Re: FSW-3 rocket decay

From: Robert Holdsworth (robbonz1@xtra.co.nz)
Date: Sat Oct 09 2004 - 13:45:19 EDT

  • Next message: Björn Gimle: "Re: How Columbia was imaged"

    The OIG catalog action report brings clarity to this.
    
    It appears I should describe the decayer as FSW-3-3 rocket, and that the
    flashing object is best described as FSW 3-2 to avoid confusion.
    
    Robert
    
    
    
    
    
    >
    > Could someone please clarify the rather confusing situation with the
    recent
    > FSW-3 satellite(s) and rocket(s), and whether any of this is due to
    catalog
    > number changes? (NB it appears that the correct reference for FSW-3
    > concerning flashing should be 28402 not 28042..)
    >
    >
    >
    > Robert Holdsworth
    > Wainuiomata
    > New Zealand
    > 41.261S
    > 174.948E
    > 103 m
    > UTC plus 13 (New Zealand Daylight Time.)
    >
    >
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:
    > http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    >
    >
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 09 2004 - 13:47:38 EDT