Re: Disappointed in Iridium 28!

From: Tony Beresford (aberesford@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Tue Oct 24 2000 - 00:06:44 PDT

Next message: Tristan Cools: "another decay reentry observation ?"

Previous message: StarliteStella@aol.com: "Disappointed in Iridium 28!"
In reply to: StarliteStella@aol.com: "Disappointed in Iridium 28!"
Next in thread: Thomas A. Troszak: "Re: Disappointed in Iridium 28!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 15:13 24/10/00 , StarliteStella@aol.com wrote:
.....
>As you can tell from the subject line, there was no flare to be seen!  Any 
>clues as to what might have happened?  And how to spot one?  I have never 
>seen one yet, but now I am reallly determined to find one!
Stella, I used Concorde, CA lat long in the Heavens-above database
to run predictions. At Concord the flare was calculated to be only mag 0
and would be even fainter if you were to the East of Concord.
So yu may have just overlooked it. 
Tony Beresford
Adelaide, So. Aust.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Tristan Cools: "another decay reentry observation ?"
Previous message: StarliteStella@aol.com: "Disappointed in Iridium 28!"
In reply to: StarliteStella@aol.com: "Disappointed in Iridium 28!"
Next in thread: Thomas A. Troszak: "Re: Disappointed in Iridium 28!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 24 2000 - 00:06:22 PDT