Re: My first superIridiumFlare
Bjoern Gimle (bjorn@tt-tech.se)
Thu, 23 Oct 1997 12:50:05 +0100
...and Iridium flare pair was single
Ed: ... but I probably saw Iridium 11 or 13.
>
I: ... This should have been Irdm 11, according to time and magnitude:
I intended to write: This should have been Irdm 13, ...
My friend timed his observation to within a few seconds, and it
was also Irdm 13 he saw.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
-- bjorn@tt-tech.se (office) b_gimle@algonet.se (home) --
-- 59.2237N, 18.2286E, 44 m http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle --
-- SeeSat-L / Visual Satellite Observer Home Page found at --
-- http://www.satellite.eu.org/satintro.html --
---------------------------------------------------------------