P>An earlier report mentioned that Faisat was steady, so I didn't bother = to report Saturday's steady pass. Perhaps Faisat was tumbling after all,= and myself and others were looking at the wrong object. I'll try to loo= k at both again tonight. I have a really early observation of two objects related to the Faisat la= unch, however, I don't know which they are and whether Faisat and rocket = body were already seperated at that time (Faisat was a piggyback payload,= wasn't it?): >were on the same orbit parallel to a line through SAO #8220 and SAO #810= 2, seperated by about 3s. The first one was brighter than the second one,= and flashing with roughly a 5s period, maxima at roughly 1m5 (brighter t= han Polaris). The track on the sky fit nicely with the prediction from th= e elset above. >Position was RA 15h17m, Decl. 71d50'. >Times: 18:28:10 UTC and 18:28:13 UTC according to my clock, which ... ... was off up to 7 seconds at that time. Using elsets, I identified the "first one" as 97 52C, and "the second one= " as 97 52A. I reported this to Eric Rosenberg but never got any reply. BTW, was this = the first observation of Faisat or not? Hej d=E5, Marco