Noss 0 r/b (5679) has progressively worse residuals - is this a user error or element discrepancy? Perfect skies but cold (40 F). 79-57A reported as seems to be a pattern; different than some previous cycles reported.
05679 71 110B 8336 E 20081116005101650 17 25 2146401+253382 37
05679 71 110B 8336 E 20081116005113440 17 25 2155769+210032 18
05679 71 110B 8336 E 20081116005220900 17 25 2233293-013269 18
05679 71 110B 8336 E 20081116005441910 17 25 2318483-282419 18
18009 87 043E 8336 E 20081116012420580 17 25 2100446+400733 18
18009 87 043E 8336 E 20081116012444270 17 25 2126750+525391 37
18010 87 043F 8336 E 20081116012807960 17 25 1950634-021864 18
18010 87 043F 8336 E 20081116012817670 17 25 1954406+002300 38
79- 57 A 08-11-16 00:01:28 BY 34.0 0.3 4 8.5 A'AA; 5->inv
68-110 A 08-11-16 00:17:52 BY Flare -3
01- 7 A 08-11-16 00:20:24 BY 78.8 S; 5 priority 2 object
06- 6 B 08-11-16 00:27:23 BY 153.7 0.3 149 1.032 A, 6->8 Note 1
91- 50 A 08-11-16 00:34:51 BY Flare +3
Note 1: On minima - much easier on this pass compared to others.
TULSA1:
COSPAR 8336 +36.1397, -95.9838, 201 m
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Nov 16 2008 - 16:59:28 UTC