Re: 27544 (02-048E) decay?

From: Tony Beresford (aberesford@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Sat Nov 09 2002 - 05:56:16 EST

  • Next message: Alan Pickup: "Re: 27544 (02-048E) decay?"

    At 19:18 9/11/02, Ed Cannon wrote:
    >I think that this must have decayed already, but I can't 
    >find any prediction or decay report, and OIG just gave 
    >me these elements with no mention of decay:
    >
    >SL-12 DEB
    >1 27544U 02048E   02305.29820762 -.00003965  12537-4  00000+0 0   123
    >2 27544  51.5302  32.2746 0041880 135.8867 262.8169 16.44146861  1773
    >SL-12 DEB
    >1 27544U 02048E   02304.73755048  .23469309  95189-5  22449-2 0   115
    >2 27544  51.5441  35.3351 0158721 151.5054 210.4698 16.08551073  1680
    Ed,
    This last elset is 8 days old now, and the derivative of the mean motion
    is not physically possible of course! 
    The object decayed without being missed by SSC. I would suggest the
    last elset is based on a spurious or mistaken observation. It would have
    decayed on day 305 which was November 1, 2002. 
    You can stll get last 5 elsets from the normal TLE enquiry on OIG,
    although asking for a decay report on 27544 produces nothing.
    Tony Beresford
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 09 2002 - 06:04:38 EST