Re: Cosmos 2367

From: Phillip Clark (psclark@dircon.co.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 10:03:43 EST

  • Next message: Alan Pickup: "Decay watch: 2001 November 30"

    On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, MALEY, PAUL D. (JSC-DO511) (USA) wrote:
    > The explosion onboard Cosmos 2367 is not likely to have blown it to bits,
    > regardless of the number of debris pieces being tracked. I have observed
    > prior such events and the main spacecraft is *always* left nearly intact as
    > far as the eye can tell. Of course, there could always be a first time. The
    > principle debris piece is actually now in a slightly higher orbit.
    
    I agree here - I was simply making the suggestion because apparently the
    remaining parent satellite had not been seen visually.
    
    I guess that the remainder of this message will stray a little OT for
    SEESAT, but I will cross-post to FPSPACE in case anyone there is
    interested in such mundane matters as EORSATs disintegrating .....
    
    This disintegration once more suggests that it is due to some consumable
    on board the satellite.   When the end-of-mission burns put the EORSATs
    into higher orbits, we regularly saw disintegrations - sometimes more
    than one per parent - but then the Russians started to perform end-of-life
    burns which lowered perigee, allowing a fairly rapid decay from
    orbit.   My guess is that they did not "fix" whatever was causing the
    disintegrations, they just ensured that the satellites re-entered before
    the time came for the "bang".
    
    Then the EORSAT launch rate started to decline and the satellite lifetimes
    were pushed closer and closer to their theoretical limits.   Recent
    EORSATs which have operated for around the 20-24 months mark have
    manoeuvred off-station and then suffered disintegrations while the rapid
    decay phase was being undertaken.   In the instance of C2367 we have had
    the disintegration before the end-of-life manoeuvre, suggesting that maybe
    the Russians pushed this satellite a little too far.
    
    It is unclear what causes the disintegration.   I understand that the
    Russians have indicated that it is not propellant-related - that would
    have been the obvious cause.
    
    In the meantime, let us see how quickly a new EORSAT a launched.   I have
    heard that a new one is to be launched during December aboard a two-stage
    Tsyklon-M out of Baikonur, but it is not clear whether that is from a
    launch schdule or speculation that C2367 was due for retirement around
    now, so a new launch "should" be due.
    
    Phillip Clark
    
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Phillip S Clark                                  Flat 2 Wellington Houses
    Molniya Space Consultancy                        Castle Hill Passage
    Compiler/Publisher, Worldwide Satellite          Hastings
        Launches                                     E Sussex  TN34 1PG
                                                     U.K.
    
    Specialist in "space archeology" - the older and more obscure the more 
    interesting it is !
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 10:14:21 EST