Re: Admin: policy for reporting high resolution ground-based imagery of Earth satellites

From: Björn Gimle (bjorn.gimle@gmail.com)
Date: Sat May 14 2011 - 09:51:24 UTC

  • Next message: Ralf Vandebergh: "ISS with Zvezda Lira Antenna & ELC-1 Flare"

    Lots of good comments, but too much for me to comment, lacking both legal
    and image processing experience.
    But back to basics:
    If a member posts links to images that he has spent time and creative skills
    to produce, why should he be more protective about links to the raw images,
    which only the camera has produced ??
    
    Concerning the right to use: Aren't we allowed to personally do any kind of
    processing of copyrighted images, as long as we don't publish the processed
    image? And write textual comments about what we have found? (E.g. several
    members wrote comments about the double flares from Sao Paolo)
    
    /Björn
    
    2011/5/13 Skywise <skywise@skywise711.com>
    
    > Ted Molczan wrote:
    > > Last August, I initiated a discussion regarding policy options for
    > reporting high resolution ground-based imagery of
    > > Earth satellites to SeeSat-L:
    > >
    > > http://satobs.org/seesat/Aug-2010/0134.html
    >
    > At that time I gave my opinion that raw data should be required, but
    > I caught so much flack from others about it that I backed off.
    >
    > In light of Thierry's excellent commentary which is backed with
    > factual evidence, I now go back to my original position that raw
    > imagery data should be provided....
    >
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL: http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/private/seesat-l/attachments/20110514/3d623e5d/attachment.html 
    _______________________________________________
    Seesat-l mailing list
    http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 14 2011 - 09:52:07 UTC