Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?

From: Allen Thomson (thomsona@flash.net)
Date: Thu May 03 2007 - 17:03:53 EDT

Next message: Tom Rauschenbach: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"

Previous message: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
In reply to: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Next in thread: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Next in thread: Tom Rauschenbach: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Reply: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

--- John Locker <john@satcom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

>> If only it was that simple  !!!!   :O)

I take it you've tried looking at a zillion frames and encountered
problems with getting good ones and combining them into a better image.
 What goes wrong?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Tom Rauschenbach: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Previous message: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
In reply to: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Next in thread: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Next in thread: Tom Rauschenbach: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Reply: John Locker: "Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 03 2007 - 17:04:53 EDT