That is one of the cornerstones of the discussion - the one we now call 25746 99028C is NOT difficult, so it can't be Misty. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Clark" <bobbygc2001@yahoo.com> To: <SeeSat-L@satobs.org> Cc: <george.olshevsky@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 6:12 PM Subject: Re: Orbital surveillance satellites now exceed 1 inch resolution? > My reading of the discussion on the "Misty" type > satellites suggests they are difficult to track > visually. > So how are these orbital elements so accurately > determined to the degree that the amount of orbital > decay they are experiencing can be determined? > > > Bob Clark > > > --- Björn Gimle (GlocalNet) > wrote: > >> It is "generally" agreed that what amateurs have >> observed is a decoy. >> See http://www.satobs.org/seesat/Dec-2005/0052.html >> and the Replies linked from there! >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 01 2007 - 15:12:25 EDT