This afternoon, the CAIB released its working scenario of the Columbia accident, which includes mention of the first videotaped debris shedding event, captured by SeeSat-L contributor Rick Baldridge, as he reported here on Feb 02: http://satobs.org/seesat/Feb-2003/0073.html "Yesterday was a bad day for me (and all of us.) I video-taped the re-entry for Mt. Hamilton, CA and took two photos. Naked-eye, we didn't notice anything too unusual, but I was spending most of my time looking through the video camera viewfinder. We thought we had just seen another spectacular NORMAL re-entry. Only an hour later when I got home did I learn of the tragedy that occurred minutes after we saw the Shuttle go by. When I looked at my video, there were very fain but definite pieces coming off, with the first piece seen on the video at 5:53:45am PST +/- 1 second. A had made a time-hack as I always do to obtain timings, and this hack was synchronized to WWV. As far as I know at this time, I was the furthest west observer on the re-entry track to get a video." The CAIB's press release does not mention Rick by name, but refers to the observation that he reported: http://www.caib.us/news/press_releases/pr030506.html "Soon after the hot gas entered the left wing multiple debris events were captured on video by observers on the ground. These video images begin at 8:53:46 EST (20 seconds after California coastal crossing) and end with Columbia's final break-up." Slide #20 of the accompanying presentation provides the same information: http://www.caib.us/news/press_briefings/pb030506_present_gehman.html At the CAIB's public hearing of March 17, the investigators expressed their high regard for the efforts of all who provided video and still imagery: http://www.caib.us/news/meetings/ph030317.html <<<MR. HUBBARD: Two kinds of questions. First type has to do where all the material, raw material came from. Obviously we owe the public a great debt of gratitude for such cooperation. Can you tell us how many different submissions or contributions there have been and how many you sorted it into and a little bit about how you determined what was useful and what wasn't? MR. HILL: Sure. Within three days of the accident, we had almost a thousand reports. Probably within a day or so of the accident actually, we were approaching a thousand different reports that varied from people calling in or sending E-mails and saying, "Hey, I looked up in the sky and saw this bright dot overhead," to, "I saw something happen and I want to talk to somebody about it," or videos where somebody called and said, "I have a video and I think I see something coming off the orbiter," or," I have still photography and I think I see something coming off the orbiter. Do you want it?" For the first day we spent most of our efforts sorting through a stack of close to 1,000 reports and, within about two weeks, about 3,000 reports that were all across the map. Just like that. We very quickly figured out if we were going to learn anything technically or anything of engineering value, it probably was not going to be in a report where people say, "Hey, I looked up and saw something in the sky," unless they said, "I looked up and I clearly saw something fall through the sky and smoke was coming off and that thing hit the ground close to my house." And there aren't very many of those. So we very quickly narrowed it down to let's look for videos as far west as we can, let's look for still photography of the orbiter in the sky as far west as we can, particularly time-lapse photography, and let's look for people that are amateur astronomers because those people are going to have a lot better secondary data like GPS coordinates on exactly where they were standing, exact zoom settings on their cameras, things like that, or exact time references, say, in the case of the video. Within a week we had it narrowed down to about 15 videos that form the core of what we now have on this map, with the videos that actually show debris shedding that we were able to time to within plus or minus a second. Then we spent some time after that first week or so prioritizing which of those we have the best celestial cues in, which of those that we think we are most likely to be able to calculate relative motion, and then which of those, like Debris 6 and 14, did we think would be so substantial that we might have a chance of getting them all the way to the ground and finding them in radar and putting boots on the ground and go and collect the hard way. So I would say it took us about a week to sort out the initial round, maybe a week after that before we knew very well which of the videos, which of the stills were going to give us any meaningful data. From there on, it was a continuous process of analyzing the video, measuring the relative motion, generating these footprints, and then searching through radar. And without the public having taken these pictures on their own - because, to our great surprise, people are still very interested, apparently, in the space program and these folks got up before sunrise and went out on their own and stuck their cameras up in the sky and most of them also knew exactly where to look in the sky because we knew they were amateur astronomers - without those folks, we wouldn't know any of this. I mean, these people are definitely our heroes. And there are about 15 to 20 of these people or these videos that are probably the most key to us having been able to do any of this analysis. ADM. GEHMAN: We join you in being thankful for that. We're also thankful for a crystal-clear morning across the entire southwest part of the United States.>>> Ted Molczan ----------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from SeeSat-L, send a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@satobs.org List archived at http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 06 2003 - 21:10:39 EDT