Re: Decay watch: 2000 May 13

From: tlj18@juno.com
Date: Fri May 26 2000 - 23:29:44 PDT

  • Next message: tlj18@juno.com: "Re: Decay watch: 2000 May 13"

    > I agree with Ron Lee that even an object much smaller than 0.61 M^2
    > could produce a bright decay event. When I hesitated to include #603
    > (63- 22 B = Transit 5A3 Scout X-3 r) in my Decay Watch list, it was
    > because I was uncertain whether SpaceCom would issue notices for it. 
    > I
    > aim to mirror SpaceCom in this regard and my understanding is that
    > SpaceCom normally issues decay warnings only for objects with an RCS 
    > of
    > 1m^2 or more. I believe that SpaceCom's prime concern is in any 
    > possible
    > ground impact of debris from the decay, and that the reasoning is 
    > that
    > objects smaller than 1m^2 have little chance of surviving re-entry.
    
    Has satellite debris ever been known to have caused any kind of property
    damage, or human life damage (injuries or deaths)?
    
    Jonathan Wojack; tlj18@juno.com
    ________________________________________________________________
    YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
    Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
    Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
    http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------
    Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
    in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
    http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat May 27 2000 - 09:16:45 PDT