Chris Peat wrote: > > I read a couple of messages recently about Iridium 5 not showing up with a > flare when expected. Here is an extract from a message I received from Theo Based on the following from Iridflar 1.60 (as much as I could cut and paste, only "day" column left out): Local Local Iridium Sun Flare Maximum Flare Ir Date Time Azm El Rnge N I Azm Elv Ang Mg MMA Latit. Longit. # --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5291 086 21:20:04 089 49 980 D L 304 -15 2.3 0 R 35.1065-105.957 5 5291 086 21:21:31 090 48 898 D L 305 -15 3.7 2 R 35.1035-105.707 61 5291 086 21:24:48 089 56 921 D L 305 -16 3.1 1 R 35.1440-107.202 34 I saw Iridium 5 flare (and iridium 61 and 34 also). 3 flare predictions, 3 flares seen (but the Iridium 5 flare seemed to be more of a -3 or -4 mag than a 0; very obvious, bright flare as it moved near Arcturus in the sky). my TLE for Iridium 5 used in Iridflar: IRIDIUM 5 1 24795U 97020D 98120.12218993 +.00000061 +00000-0 +13981-4 0 02053 2 24795 086.4143 358.5735 0003700 039.4002 320.7477 14.36938289051648 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- de fcc sgn, Robert Smathers (roberts@nmia.com) Albuquerque, NM USA Robert's Satellite TV/Baseball page: http://www.nmia.com/~roberts/ Proud owner, 5 TODYWEN(!) and 4 BUD-lites - Albuquerque Intl. Downlinkport Satellite Services Guide Manager & Co-Monitor, SATELLITE TIMES magazine