81- 84 B 96-05-05 21:04:12 LB 116.4 1 2 58 MM, mag 5->7 83- 42 B 96-05-05 21:08:28 LB 109.1 1 2 55 MM, mag 5->inv 86- 19 C 96-05-05 20:30:23 LB 24.2 0.2 20 1.21 FF, mag 6->inv 88- 23 B 96-05-05 20:37:37 LB 72.7 0.5 4 18.2 AA, mag 6->inv 88- 50 A 96-05-05 20:53:25 LB 72.0 0.2 10 7.20 AA, mag 4->6 88-102 A 96-05-05 20:56:28 LB 75.9 0.5 6 12.6 AA, mag 5->6 89- 16 A 96-05-05 21:22:23 LB 62.0 0.5 8 7.8 AA, mag 5->7 89- 28 B 96-05-05 21:52:18 LB 134.1 0.5 10 13.4 AA, mag 4->inv 90- 81 K 96-05-05 20:42:27 LB 151.6 0.5 4 37.9 AA, mag 5->inv 91- 81 B 96-05-05 22:00:06 LB 91.1 2 1 91 AA, mag 4->6 92- 93 B 96-05-05 21:12 LB S, mag 3 93- 20 B 96-05-05 21:55 LB S, mag 6 94- 74 B 96-05-05 20:21:31 LB 100.9 0.5 10 10.1 AA, mag 3->7 96- 17 A 96-05-05 21:47 LB almost S, mag 6 96- 17 B 96-05-05 21:45 LB S, mag 5 When I made the observation of what I thought was 91-17 B it showed up early. So after following it for a while I looked back along the track and saw another object in the same orbit that was almost S, mag 6. Later on I used Skymap and put in the TLE's of 96-17 A and B. Skymap nicely showed an almost perfect match of the observed trajectories with B coming along first, followed about 2 minutes later by A. So my first guess that the second object was B proved to be wrong! Skymap is a great program. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Name: Leo Barhorst Alkmaar (Neth) 52 deg 38 min N 4 deg 47 min E 2 m ASL E-mail: leobarhorst@pi.net also a member of Seesat-L ------------------------------------------------------------------------