I assume #26934 was also raised on or about the same day, to a MM 0.01 above #28888. I modified my search orbit to have a pass 2:48 after #28888, but realized too late that I should have used recent radio obs as a time base, instead of the above time diff. So I started too late. USA 161 08079 972 x 312 1 26934U 01044A 08079.85996550 .00001600 00000-0 31730-4 0 13 2 26934 97.8833 192.5857 0470000 25.1092 119.1310 14.75900000 27518 Relative to this elset, my search was -0/+16 min , and I saw NO satellite in 10*50. My mag limit was about +6.5 at 18 degrees alt in the N, because haze was returning. In the morning we had 10 degrees warmer, clouds and snow. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Björn Gimle @GlocalNet" <bg_26934@glocalnet.net> To: "Pierre NEIRINCK" <pierre-neirinck@wanadoo.fr>; <SeeSat-L@satobs.org> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2008 10:28 PM Subject: 5919 Obs 05-42A > Three new observations of #28888 > 28888 05 042A 5919 E 20080323191852530 17 25 1016124+232786 67 S > 28888 05 042A 5919 E 20080323191910000 17 25 1016433+291883 48 S > 28888 05 042A 5919 E 20080323191944530 17 25 1017446+424938 58 S > > In my Mar.21 obs I forgot to mark the poor accuracy of the > 2nd and 3rd points, which were ~.2 degree appulses. > Here are the crosstrack (in)accuracies and correct timings, > but the offsets adjusted to fit the new orbit ;-) > 28888 05 042A 5919 B 20080321183051050 17 25 1431914+553270 19 S > 28888 05 042A 5919 B 20080321183114800 17 25 1525438+584537 19 S > > Congratulations to Ted for a very accurate "search" TLE 08080.87 > and to Russell for recovery. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Björn Gimle @GlocalNet > To: Pierre NEIRINCK > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 12:32 PM > Subject: Re: 05-42A > > > Cher Pierre, > > these high lateral offsets are not on the wrong side, they > are roughly estimated appulses. > I noticed the large errors when entering them into > ObsReduce, but didn't fake "correct" observations. > > /Björn > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Pierre NEIRINCK > To: bg_26934@glocalnet.net > Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 3:20 AM > Subject: 05-42A > > > Dear Bjoern, > Precious for drag which I did not Know. > Before and after iteration of time. If first is OK,drag is > .00010(early) > 2 0 ; -10 20 ; 10 -24 > 0 -1 ; -12 19 ; 8 -25 > Not checked star atlas but looks like inverted side of stars. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: > http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 24 2008 - 12:27:30 UTC