Re: Orbital express orbit

From: Leo Barhorst (leo.barhorst@tele2.nl)
Date: Mon Mar 12 2007 - 17:45:30 EDT

  • Next message: GlocalNet: "Re: 5919 Obs 2007-03-11 problems"

    David,
    
    That was my idea too.
    I've seen some picture on the internet with the complete stack.
    Will try to find it again tomorrow.
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "David Anderman" <davida@cwo.com>
    To: "seesat-l" <seesat-l@satobs.org>
    Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 10:27 PM
    Subject: Re: Orbital express orbit
    
    
    > Leo:
    >
    > The "C" object is probably the OrbEx launch adapter then, jettisoned so 
    > that it would not have to be carried by Centaur any further than 
    > necessary, that is my guess.  This would leave the "A" object as the 
    > combined payload.
    >
    > DWA
    >
    >
    > At 02:20 PM 3/12/2007, Leo Barhorst wrote:
    >>Perhaps this is outdated? It is from Aug 24, 2006.
    >>See the 3rd paragraph.
    >>Separation later in the 3 month mission.
    >>
    >>I watched the launch on the internet.
    >>In a real time simulation they showed the relase of Astro with NextSat 
    >>still on top of it.
    >>If I remember well the commentator also said that first test were to 
    >>performed with the
    >>sats still attteched, including the manipulator arm. Later on they would 
    >>separate and
    >>dock again. No details on the timeline.
    >>
    >>On the following URL I found conformation for this.
    >>http://www.aiaa.org/aerospace/images/articleimages/pdf/AA_Feb07_WIL.pdf.
    >>
    >>The DARPA mission is expected to last three
    >>
    >>or four months, starting slowly with a few weeks
    >>
    >>of systems checks and some fluid transfers
    >>
    >>while the two satellites are still mated in their
    >>
    >>launch configuration.
    >>
    >>"Then we will use the arm, starting slow and
    >>
    >>working up to more complicated operations, to
    >>
    >>detach NextSat from ASTRO and eject the separation
    >>
    >>ring that will help us during the launch.
    >>
    >>Then we reattach, do another set of fluid transfers,
    >>
    >>then some battery and computer component
    >>
    >>replacements (the computer will be on ASTRO,
    >>
    >>then taken off, then put back on ASTRO,
    >>
    >>but never switched to NextSat)," Geery says.
    >>
    >>"Then we start unmated operations, again
    >>
    >>starting slow, backing away to 10 m, then remating,
    >>
    >>then gradually getting farther away, ultimately
    >>
    >>to a baseline of 7 km. But we have designed
    >>
    >>for cases up to 200 km, with autonomous
    >>
    >>guidance back to dock."
    >>
    >>Greetings and clear skies
    >>Leo Barhorst - Medemblik - The Netherlands
    >>Homepage: www.satlist.nl
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >>Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:
    >>http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    >>
    >
    > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: 
    > http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    >
    >
    >
    > -- 
    > No virus found in this incoming message.
    > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.9/719 - Release Date: 12-3-2007 
    > 8:41
    > 
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 12 2007 - 17:50:11 EDT