Re: iridium 38 disappoints

From: Stephan Szyman (szymanss@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Mar 22 2006 - 16:41:15 EST

Next message: Gerhard HOLTKAMP: "Re: Which is correct?"

Previous message: Lutz Schindler: "Observation 22.03.06"
In reply to: Chris Peat: "Re: iridium 38 disappoints"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

thanks, chris!

also: a little correction: the  bolide occurred at approximately 19:30 cdt 
(not 17:30 duh)

clear skies!

stephan szyman
chicago IL USA
41.9630N, 87.7561W; 188 msl


>Hi All,
>I have update the HA database and marked Iridium 38 as a non-flarer, so it 
>will not appear in flare predictions from now on.
>
>Chris Peat
>Heavens-Above.com
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Gerhard HOLTKAMP: "Re: Which is correct?"
Previous message: Lutz Schindler: "Observation 22.03.06"
In reply to: Chris Peat: "Re: iridium 38 disappoints"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 22 2006 - 16:43:16 EST