Re: iridium 38 disappoints

From: Kevin Fetter (kfetter@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 21:25:03 EST

Next message: Scott Campbell: "Satobs 22 March 2006"

Previous message: Stephan Szyman: "iridium 38 disappoints"
In reply to: Stephan Szyman: "iridium 38 disappoints"
Next in thread: Björn Gimle: "Re: iridium 38 disappoints"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

According to Mike Mccants Page

http://users2.ev1.net/~mmccants/tles/iridium.html

Iridium 38 Failed in August 2003, so that explains why it didn't flare.

I recommend you check that page, so you can avoid flares from failed iridium sat's, that are
predicted.

Kevin




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: Scott Campbell: "Satobs 22 March 2006"
Previous message: Stephan Szyman: "iridium 38 disappoints"
In reply to: Stephan Szyman: "iridium 38 disappoints"
Next in thread: Björn Gimle: "Re: iridium 38 disappoints"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Mar 21 2006 - 21:26:35 EST