28646 05 016A 2701 G 20060303012623960 17 25 0401685-013398 67 S 28646 05 016A 2701 G 20060303012729560 17 25 0437411+151016 67 S 28646 05 016A 2701 G 20060303012731870 17 25 0439108+155612 97 S IOD format: http://www.satobs.org/position/IODformat.html Lacrosse 5 was about 0.2 s early relative these week-old elements: Lacrosse 5 15.0 4.0 0.0 2.5 v 1 28646U 05016A 06054.69099923 -.00000078 00000-0 -18589-4 0 05 2 28646 57.0134 91.5591 0004657 22.0551 338.0662 14.53342475 01 Arc 2006 Jan 29.25 - Feb 23.75, WRMS residuals = 0.016 deg Like Ed Cannon, I observed optical behaviour atypical of this object. Normally, its magnitude depends little on phase angle, but in this case, at phase angle 104 deg it was 2 to 3 magnitudes fainter than predicted, then brightened rapidly, so that by phase angle 90 deg it seemed brighter than average. Greg Roberts observed it fainter than average on 2006 Feb 23, as did Russell Eberst on Feb 19. During its first 9 days in orbit, the object was fainter, and its brightness much more dependent on phase angle, than at most subsequent times. Perhaps it has temporarily reverted to something like that mode. My speculation has been that the optical behaviour of the first 9 days was due to the SAR (synthetic aperture radar) not yet having been deployed. I doubt that the antenna would ever be re-stowed; most likely, its recent optical behaviour is due to the combination of a complex shape and an unusual attitude. Site 2701: 43.68764 N, 79.39243 W, 230 m Ted Molczan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Mar 03 2006 - 07:30:30 EST