My apologies - I noticed the error, and didn't intend to resend the 20050301 obs after checks. I had problems matching my memory to ObsReduce charts, and the 28059 03 049C line included with the 3/3 resend is evidence that I tried explaining the error by a mis-id. I couldn't find "my" stars along the 28059 track either, so please disregard my Mar.01 obs. Furthermore, Russell's obs Mar.05 0300902 210631.87 191525+465430 5.2 5.2 0 S seems very close to my suggested orbit, and standard mean motion. /Björn ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike McCants" > Hello Bjorn, > > The two sets of obs of 03 009B give 50 seconds time residuals > compared to the "standard" orbit. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 07 2005 - 16:16:25 EST