Re: Difference between observed and predicted time of satellite pass

From: Bjorn Gimle (b.gimle@chello.se)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 14:56:03 EST

  • Next message: John Locker: "Geo shadow chasing"

    In general the effect of drag is given by the ndot2 value
    (here -.00000134) * age(days)**2 orbits
    Today, 10 days after day 04067 this would be .000134 orbits
    One orbit is 1440/14.1268 minutes, or 103 minutes.
    So the net effect would be 0.0138 minutes, or less than a second.
    It would take 200 days for this elset to reach 5 minutes in total,
    and the error might be 20% or so.
    
    If you load the elset in Rob Matson's SkyMap, it computes this
    approximation.
    
    However, this object is one of a few special cases, where the mean
    motion of 14.12 causes a resonance with the Earth's gravitational
    anomalies.
    
    For normal objects, where drag is the overwhelming effect, the ndot2
    value is positive (and the rule-of-thumb is usually reasonable),
    but for Cosmos 1833 I have seen ndot2 values as low as -.00000320,
    though the average since 2000 has been  about +0.00000080
    
    Cosmos 1833
    1 17589U 87027A   04067.89627470 -.00000134  00000-0 -46528-4 0  8510
    2 17589  70.9095 294.3979 0003131 111.1350 249.0106 14.12684325875418
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    
    > Hi Geoff,
    >
    > The differance can be easily explaned.
    > How old were your TLE's?
    > When they are a bit outdated a difference of several minutes is quite
    well
    > possible
    > depending on how high the orbit of the sat is.
    > Lower sats are more effected by the earth's atmosphere than higher
    ones.
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 17 2004 - 15:11:18 EST