Tony Beresford communicated, > The TLE equivalent for this is below. I have "borrowed" the > catalog number of prognosz 1 as a matter of convenience, and the > checksums wont work ( I know this doesnt affect Mike McCant's HIGHFLY > The brightness at perigee could be as bright as mag 10. > GlO10 mag 3.2 18400 by 192000 km > 1 05941U 72029A 00059.80000000 .00000000 +0000-0 +00000-0 0 0001 > 2 05941 062.7017 350.6869 7719220 002.4567 169.3679 00.241959489 00 A very interesting discovery. Might I suggest, however, that it be assigned a 9xxxx number until the identification is more certain? Perhaps those adept at orbitology can do a heroic feat of retrodiction and see if the new object's orbit matches any of the last know Prognoz ones. BTW, do we have a convention for 9xxxx numbers, such as 9YYNNN? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 01 2000 - 09:40:17 PST