How is XSS-11 "lost"? DWA At 10:54 AM 6/23/2007, Mike McCants wrote: >Greg Roberts posted: > > >I wonder if Eds/Brads object in vicinity of AMS 1 is not possibly XSS11 > >which is lost at the moment? > >The RA of ascending node for XSS 11 could not possibly have changed >enough to match AMS 1. > >Mike McCants > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: >http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 23 2007 - 14:04:10 EDT