Re: Off Topic: average daylight

From: Jeff Umbarger (jumbarger2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jun 16 2006 - 17:40:09 EDT

  • Next message: David Brierley: "Observations of 05-42A"

    Wow Gerhard,
         This is too cool! I was going to do this with
    Heavens-Above but it just seemed to cumbersome. So
    about the *difference* between the amount of sunshine,
    twilight, and darkness at the poles and arctic circles
    - do you suppose this has to do with the Earth's
    aphelion and perihelion differences?
    
         Regards,
              Jeff Umbarger
              Plano, TX USA
    
    --- Gerhard HOLTKAMP <grd.holtkamp@t-online.de> wrote:
    
    > 
    > A few months ago (having had nothing better to do at
    > the time) I calculated 
    > the total hours of sunshine and various twilights
    > for different latitudes in 
    > 2005. The Northern Arctic Circle came out first with
    > sunshine hours (4647 h). 
    > The North Pole had 4575 h, the equator 4422 h, the
    > Southern Arctic Circle 
    > 4530 h and the South Pole 4387 h. (Sunshine being
    > defined as the upper limb 
    > of the sun still visible with refraction.)
    > 
    > The maximum of civil twilight hours (the center of
    > the sun being higher than 
    > -6 degrees) was at 69 deg north with 5513 h (and not
    > at the artic circle with 
    > 5487 h). The North Pole showed 5212 h, the equator
    > 4684 h and the South Pole 
    > 5031 h. 
    > 
    > If it comes to the total hours of perfectly dark sky
    > (sun below -18 deg and no 
    > moon) the worst was 80 deg North with just 801 h
    > (the North Pole had 829 h). 
    > You could enjoy 1788 h at the equator and 1066 h at
    > the South Pole. (Of 
    > course your total darkness at the poles would
    > further get disturbed by 
    > aurorae!) 
    > 
    > Ironically, although the equator is best for dark
    > skies it seems to be less 
    > favorable for visual observations of low flying
    > satellites due to the short 
    > twilight there and also due to the fact that polar
    > orbiting satellites are 
    > converging over the polar regions and can be
    > observed more frequently there. 
    > So pick your favorite satellite observation spot!
    > 
    > Gerhard HOLTKAMP
    > Darmstadt, Germany
    > 
    >
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    > Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked
    > Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    > http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    > 
    > 
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 16 2006 - 17:43:56 EDT