> On June 3 UTC (Saturday evening USA time) I observed Superbird A > from about 3:54 to 3:58, so I suggest that anyone wanting to see > it tonight (Tuesday evening USA time) begin looking for it roughly > at 3:45-55 (maybe as early as 3:40-50 if your're using a well-aimed > telescope). Ed is right - I corrected a sign error in the vector result for the flash position, forgetting that the correction had been applied to the RA/Dec conversion already. I now get RA 10:47, Dec +3 at 03:46 UTC tonight for Austin, Texas , 10:47 +2 03:39 UTC for San Francisco, CA -- bjorn.gimle@tietotech.se (office) -- -- b_gimle@algonet.se (home) http://www.algonet.se/~b_gimle -- -- COSPAR 5919, MALMA, 59.2576 N, 18.6172 E, 23 m -- -- COSPAR 5918, HAMMARBY, 59.2985 N, 18.1045 E, 44 m -- > > "graveyard orbit for sun-synchs" -- what was I thinking?! I need > to add to my sig. a standard "This message was probably written > between 3:00 and 5:00 a.m. and is therefore highly suspect!" > But anyway, I was curious about the fate of Landsats 4 and 5. > I've seen Landsat 4 and Landsat 7 in the last week or so. (Still > haven't managed to see Landsat 4 flares as reported by Don > Gardner a long time ago.) > > Ed Cannon - ecannon@mail.utexas.edu - Austin, Texas, USA > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' > in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org > http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 05:51:42 PDT