> Object: #21025 = 90-112 F = Raduga 26 aux motor > > Notice prepared: 2000 Jun 28 22:15 UTC > > Decay predictions: > Source Prediction made Predicted decay at Latitude > Longitude > UTC UTC deg deg > > SpaceCom Jun 27 16:16 Jul 1 21:10 +-3d 12.5 S 51.5 > W > SpaceCom Jun 27 21:19 Jul 1 21:48 +-2d 46.2 N 34.3 > E > > SatEvo Jun 28 22:15 Jul 2 00:51 +-19h Why does SatEvo always have a lower magin of error (+/-) than SpaceCom? Is it just how the program SatEvo works, or is it than SatEvo has historically been more precise than SpaceCom? --------------------------------------------------------------- Jonathan T. Wojack tlj18@juno.com http://www.geocities.com/tlj18_99 39.75 N 75.55 W ________________________________________________________________ YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET! Juno now offers FREE Internet Access! Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 28 2000 - 16:25:44 PDT