Re: oig data slightly messed up

From: Tony Beresford (aberesford@iprimus.com.au)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 07:24:47 EDT

Next message: sattrack@hal-pc.org: "Epoch Date Age Analysis"

Previous message: Kevin Fetter: "Re: oig data slightly messed up"
In reply to: Kevin Fetter: "oig data slightly messed up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 20:28 23/07/02, Kevin Fetter wrote:
>Do other's get the same result, for the following satellite's most recent orbital element from the oig. The info on line 1 is in a funny format :)
>
>MOLNIYA 2-10
>1 07376U 74056A   02202.37802949 -.00000936 »„0 Åp3 0 04610
>2 07376 064.5122 341.2561 7031651 268.6694 017.2511 02.00504029204411

No I dont Kevi, just a glitch , that turned some ASCII characters
into 8-bit characters I think. The information below was obtained
around 11:20 UT July 23.
Tony Beresford

MOLNIYA 2-10
1 07376U 74056A   02202.37802949 -.00000936 +00000-0 +10000-3 0 04610
2 07376 064.5122 341.2561 7031651 268.6694 017.2511 02.00504029204411


-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html

Next message: sattrack@hal-pc.org: "Epoch Date Age Analysis"
Previous message: Kevin Fetter: "Re: oig data slightly messed up"
In reply to: Kevin Fetter: "oig data slightly messed up"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 23 2002 - 07:30:07 EDT