I have updated the following elements, using observations by myself, David Brierley, Russell Eberst and Peter Wakelin, from 13 to 17 July UTC: USA 116 15.0 3.0 0.0 5.1 v 1 23728U 95066A 00199.03659722 .00045057 00000-0 10222-2 0 04 2 23728 97.8819 309.5338 0451926 94.7937 270.5244 14.77716646 06 USA 129 15.0 3.0 0.0 5.1 v 1 24680U 96072A 00199.07572338 .00030574 00000-0 44307-3 0 01 2 24680 97.8821 261.3211 0499152 244.3019 110.5587 14.77422231 06 Mean residuals of both elements are about 1 arc min. I observed the following points last night: 24680 96 072A 2701 F 20000717020101010 17 25 1915960+190035 28 S 24680 96 072A 2701 F 20000717020121760 17 25 1921527+253566 27 S 24680 96 072A 2701 F 20000717020235810 17 25 1957228+505129 18 S My middle point has a much higher residual in the differential correction than the accuracy I reported. Perhaps a timing error. Perhaps I am too optimistic about my ability to estimate positions between stars 0.051 deg apart. I suspect its a bit of both. Ted Molczan ----------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe' in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 17 2000 - 06:32:14 PDT