Study of astrodynamic standards

From: Allen Thomson (
Date: Sun Jan 15 2012 - 21:55:15 UTC

  • Next message: Jonathan McDowell: "Re: new Phobos-Grunt TIP on Space-Track not quite helpful....."

    In researching some things related to Phobos-Grunt reentry predictions, I came across this. The National Academy links to information on the study, DEPS-ASEB-10-05, to seem to be broken at the moment but the final report should be interesting for TLE users.
    NRL's Dr. John Emmert Appointed to NRC Committee to Assess Air Force Orbit Standards
    12/19/2011 16:00 EST - NRL News Release 160-11r
    Dr. John Emmert Of the Naval Research Laboratory's Space Science Division is now serving on a newly convened National Research Council study. The committee is assessing the astrodynamics algorithms that the Air Force uses to maintain a catalog of over 20,000 objects in Earth orbit. Dr. Emmert's expertise is in atmospheric density modeling, which is the largest source of orbit prediction uncertainty for objects in low Earth orbit.
    The Air Force commissioned the National Research Council (NRC) to assess the astrodynamic standards established by Air Force Space Command (AFSPC) and their effectiveness in meeting mission performance needs, as well as possible alternatives. The Joint Space Operations Center (JSpOC) uses astrodynamic algorithms to perform satellite orbit determination and prediction in order to maintain a catalog of over 20,000 objects, ranging from active satellites to tiny pieces of orbital debris. AFSPC established this set of astrodynamic algorithms as standards to be used in operational space surveillance mission systems. These standards were implemented to achieve interoperability between the JSpOC and the mission systems and to ensure mission performance.
    The NRC Committee will: (1) assess the current AFSPC astrodynamic standard orbit determination and prediction models for accuracy, interoperability, and ability to meet JSpOC and user mission requirements; (2) compare and contrast leading industry, academic, and government alternatives, including benefits and drawbacks, to the current AFSPC astrodynamic standard; (3) outline options for a strategy of how AFSPC should proceed with using these alternate standards to meet JSpOC and user requirements; and, (4) examine broader issues concerning overall cost and risk of the options. 
    Seesat-l mailing list

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 15 2012 - 21:55:52 UTC