Re: USA193 decay and flux values clarified

From: George Roberts (
Date: Wed Jan 30 2008 - 18:59:41 UTC

  • Next message: Russell Eberst: "2008JAN30.OBS"

    Rats - I reread my previous post and I got part of it backward.  High flux in
    the past implies low A/m which implies rock-like implies later decay.  Low flux
    value in the past implies high A/m implies feather-like implies sooner decay.
    The rest of my post looks fine - basically itexplained how the historic flux is
    more of a factor than the future flux resulting in opposite expected oribital
    - George Roberts
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 30 2008 - 18:58:50 UTC