23908 96 029C 8539 F 20080110001136420 17 25 0007207+290266 38 23936 96 029E 8539 F 20080110001145530 17 25 0010163+290945 38 23862 96 029D 8539 F 20080110001313670 17 25 0022613+243372 38 23862 96 029D 8539 F 20080110001330280 17 25 0036411+210388 38 23862 96 029D 8539 F 20080110001423670 17 25 0115161+094534 38 23862 96 029D 8539 F 20080110001521650 17 25 0148736-012802 38 23862 96 029D 8539 F 20080110001746150 17 25 0247068-213708 58 Start point at Alpheratz, alpha andromeda, for all 3 sats. I picked the 3rd one to track. My last point did not seem to agree with the other points on that sat. Notes said 2x multipler on 2 stars using ObsReduce and that is what is reported above. If it was a 3 multipler it may be more accurate. This is why degree of accuarcy was reduced in last IOD point. Reference stars for that point were .076 degree apart. Earlier I photographed with a 30 second exposure Iridium 43 flaring to -8 mag. Sky had thin cloud layer everywhere. Seeing in telescope only to 10 mag at best. Lat. 39.4707 Lon. -79.3388 Alt. 2753 ft. -5 UTC What these numbers mean : http://www.satobs.org/position/IODformat.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 10 2008 - 02:33:39 UTC