> daniel crawford wrote: > > > The description of the object being a 'meteor shower' is a bit > > upsetting to me, especially if the source was the meteorologist! > > Usually it is the other way around: true meteoric fireballs that get deemed > "space junk decay" in the news. And now we have one of those rare cases of a > true decay...and they call it a meteor shower instead! :-D And a meteor shower from an extinct constellation, no less! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 05 2007 - 00:53:44 EST