Don Gardner wrote at Fri, 7 Jan 2000 23:39:09 EST:
> The problem I'm having is the proper PPAS format for a clear
> pattern of a primary flash (-1 mag) followed 2.8 seconds later by a
> secondary flash (+3 mag) with an 8.4 sec delay before the pattern repeats.
On a similar observation of a different object, Kurt suggested to me
that I report the flash period as the time between primary flashes but
indicate the secondary and tertiary flashes (that occurred early in
the pass in-between the primary flashes) in the comments column, e.g.,
F'FfF'Ff->F'F' in my case, or F'fF'f in your case, with the reported
flash period corresponding to the interval between two F'.
Once the promised comments column extension is implemented :-) we'll
have room to note regular secondary/tertiary flash period timings.
Apologies if this is a duplication. I forgot about the DNS problem
with lists.satellite.eu.org on the first posting.
--Sue Worden (worden@fc.net)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe from SeeSat-L by sending a message with 'unsubscribe'
in the SUBJECT to SeeSat-L-request@lists.satellite.eu.org
http://www2.satellite.eu.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 08 2000 - 12:40:25 PST