Sorry I meant PST not PDT in the post below. s On 2/9/2016 11:16 PM, Scott Tilley via Seesat-l wrote: > Hi All > > I'm not so sure after some further analysis. > > I suspect the signal I copied could be Metop-A, 29499 as I just copied > it again at the predicted time for Metop-A during its pass around 11pm > PDT. > > I would give my previous reports much suspicion based on this > observation. > > Begin passes prediction from 18:13:59 2016.02.09 to 02:13:59 > 2016.02.10 PDT > ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > satellite______________|int. des.___|number|el._|sat. > mag._|rise________________|set_________________|data age|pass___| > METOP-A 2006-044A 29499 22 6.5 19:31:03 > 2016.02.09 19:44:44 2016.02.09 0.3 13.7 > KMS 4 2016-009A 41332 32 ? 19:35:12 > 2016.02.09 19:46:02 2016.02.09 0.1 10.8 > KMS 4 2016-009A 41332 21 ? 21:08:54 > 2016.02.09 21:19:19 2016.02.09 0.2 10.4 > METOP-A 2006-044A 29499 70 7.2 21:09:48 > 2016.02.09 21:25:14 2016.02.09 0.3 15.4 > METOP-A 2006-044A 29499 11 8.7 22:52:41 > 2016.02.09 23:04:28 2016.02.09 0.4 11.8 > ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > > Regards, > Scott > > > > > > On 2/9/2016 11:01 PM, Satcom via Seesat-l wrote: >> >> >> >> >> From: Satcom <john_at_satcom.freeserve.co.uk> >> To: Scott Tilley <sthed475_at_telus.net> >> >> If it helps , I played Scotts wav file through SDR sharp....the signal >> id definitely there , and pretty strong. >> Here is a grab from the visualisation. >> >> https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4g1kKs0cR7ZNFlwenlyazBvYUE/view?usp=sharing. >> >> >> >> My guess.... Scott is spot on with his assumption that this is KMS-4 >> >> Regards >> >> John >> >> >> >> >> On 10/02/2016 05:35, Scott Tilley via Seesat-l wrote: >>> Further to my last, I have copied a second pass with timings that >>> closely match Spacetrack TLEs. >>> >>> The signal is weak and experiences deep fades with obvious modulation. >>> Hear the recording below to form you're own opinion. >>> >>> The signal seems to have drifted up in overall frequency since last >>> orbit. >>> >>> Here's a 75MB wav file of the entire pass that anyone can hear. I >>> screwed up making a wideband recording due to unfamilaritity with the >>> software but I hope it helps with the analysis. It's just demodulated >>> audio not the raw 190KHz bandwidth. It starts off uninteresting but >>> gets very loud with signal a few minutes in around (6-7 minutes) and >>> near the end of the pass. Best viewed with something that can >>> visualize >>> the signal. >>> >>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/15916951/Record0_20160210_050859.wav >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Scott >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Seesat-l mailing list >>> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l >>> >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Seesat-l mailing list >> http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l >> > > _______________________________________________ > Seesat-l mailing list > http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-l > _______________________________________________ Seesat-l mailing list http://mailman.satobs.org/mailman/listinfo/seesat-lReceived on Wed Feb 10 2016 - 01:42:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Feb 10 2016 - 07:42:29 UTC