Re: Cosmos Illustration: Accurate?

From: Bjoern Gimle@GlocalNet (Gimle@GlocalNet)
Date: Sat Feb 21 2009 - 10:42:27 UTC

  • Next message: Russell Eberst: "Re: Cosmos Illustration: Accurate?"

    The second image in the left bar is NOT an Iridium, and
    the fifth, supposed to be CÚrise 1, I don't know, and
    the third (debris cloud) looks very much like an "artist's conception" like 
    the "Iridium".
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    
    > Can anyone verify that this is in fact an accurate illustration of
    > Cosmos 2251? It's very different from others claimed to be of the
    > Strela model in question.
    >
    > http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/02/photogalleries/satellite-collision-pictures/index.html
    >
    
    
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive:  
    http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Feb 21 2009 - 10:48:54 UTC