--- Mike McCants <mmccants@io.com> wrote: > On the other hand, it might be reasonable to assume that many > of these pieces will be irregularly shaped and spinning rapidly. > If so, they might give visual flashes much brighter than their > RCS might indicate. But human eyes are better at spotting such > flashes than a video system (in my opinion). That's his option. Mine is the video system is better at detecting flashes. It can see fainter then my eye, and have a record of what I observed. Would have never found 90041, the unid in Dec, both flashing objects. Also with video system, I found what's called 90023, which I call milstar 1. Then the video system, confirmed flares from Inmarsat F4-2 ( 29988 ) and the Boeing HS702 series with of solar concentrators. And that I can see the APT'S with my eye's. So the video system improves my sat viewing, and allows for me to make discoveries, such as the above. So me like it alot. Kevin __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Frequently Asked Questions, SeeSat-L archive: http://www.satobs.org/seesat/seesatindex.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 10:36:05 EST